RANDHIR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. MAHAVIR KAUSHIK AND OTHERS
COCP/3672/2024 · 2025-08-11
Nidhi Gupta
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92575 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92575 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209
Randhir Singh and another
Sh. Mahavir
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in No. 6610-6612 of 2016, others’ decided on maintainable. It is withdraw the present contempt petition.
submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners.
11.08.2025 rishu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Randhir Singh and another
Versus Sh. Mahavir Kaushik and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Man Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in 6612 of 2016, titled as ‘State of Haryana decided on 07.04.2022, the present contempt petition is not maintainable. It is accordingly, prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition.
Learned counsel for the State has not disputed the aforesaid
submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3672-2024
Date of Decision: 11.08.2025
.… Petitioners
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for the petitioner. rashar, AAG, Haryana.
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal State of Haryana vs. Jai Singh and 07.04.2022, the present contempt petition is not accordingly, prayed that he may be permitted to
Learned counsel for the State has not disputed the aforesaid
submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No
s submits Civil Appeal Jai Singh and 07.04.2022, the present contempt petition is not accordingly, prayed that he may be permitted to
Learned counsel for the State has not disputed the aforesaid RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.