COCP-3152 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 Lal Singh Amit Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 16.03.2023 of this Court in State of Punjab and others 2. submits that in compliance of order dated whereby the respondents were directed to take lawful decisions appeals enumerated therein, decision dated has been taken submits that may be disposed of. 3. the case having been called twice. 4. 3152-2023 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Versus Amit Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 16.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by of this Court in CWP-5314-2023, titled as State of Punjab and others’. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of order dated the respondents were directed to take lawful decisions appeals enumerated therein, decision dated taken by the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that thus, nothing survives in the pre may be disposed of. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the case having been called twice. Heard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3152-2023 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order by the Hon’ble Division Bench , titled as ‘Lal Singh and another vs. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of order dated 16.03.2023 (Annexure P-1), the respondents were directed to take lawful decisions in the appeals enumerated therein, decision dated 16.10.2024 (Annexure R-1/T) . Learned counsel for the respondent nothing survives in the present petition and the same There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order Division Bench vs. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent , in the 1/T) . Learned counsel for the respondent sent petition and the same There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.25 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3152 5. required to be passed; and the pre accordingly. 6. 7. 24.09.2025 rishu 3152-2023 -2- In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is sent petition is hereby disposed of, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is disposed of, RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.25 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.