KULDEEP SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HARIDWAR
WPCRL/1486/2022 · 2025-08-01
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9257 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9257 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1516 of 2022 With WPCRL No.1486 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Devansh Dhiman, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State.
3. There is no representation for the respondents.
4. State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a final report dated 19.04.2023 has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, in both these writ petitions.
5. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in these writ petitions.
6. Accordingly the writ petitions are closed.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
01.08.2025 SK