IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 115 CWP-24131-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.08.2025. DEEPAK KUMAR ... Petitioner(s) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Gaurav Arora, Advocate, with Ms. Malvika Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 08.05.2025 submitted by the petitioner Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the aforesaid representation has already been decided by the competent authority and an intimation has also been sent by the office to the petitioner vide Memo No.J.II.06(LN)/2025-Legal dated 12.08.2025. A copy of the same has also been supplied to this Court which is taken on record as Mark ‘X’. In view of above, counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant writ petition and seeks withdrawal of the same with liberty to take recourse to the alternative remedies available to the petitioner as per law. Ordered accordingly. August 21, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.22 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document