APHC010101752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI S WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 278 OF 2025 Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C aggrieved by the to Judgment dt. 06.09.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2022 file of the Court of Learned VIII Additional District on the & Sessions Judge, conviction and passed in C.C. Magistrate, Vijayawada, dismissing by the appeal thereby confirming the sentence imposed by Calendar and Judgment dt. 28.11.2022 No. 512 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the IV Special Vijayawada. Between: Sri Rama Planners and Builders, Represented By its Proprietor, P.V.Raja Sekhar, S/o. P.V.Krishna Prasad, aged 38 years, R/o. D.No. 66-3-23, Tagore Type Institute Road, Near Ganganamma Vijayawada, N.T.R District. Temple, Patamata ...PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. High Court ...RESPONDENT ' r 2. M/s Sai Mayur Granites AND Marbles, Represented By its Proprietor, Y. Rama Krishna, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Aged 40 years, R/o. D.No. 54- 15-9B, Srinivasa Nagar,Bank Colony, Near Tata Show Room, Vijayawada, N.T.R District. ...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: M/s Sai Mayur Granites & Marbles, Represented Y. Rama Krishna, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Aged 40 years, R/o. D.No. 54-15- 9B, Srinivasa Nagar, Bank Colony, Near Tata Show Room N.T.R District. By its Proprietor, Vijayawada ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT AND 1. Sri Rama Planners and Builders, Represented P.V.Raja Sekhar, S/o. P.V.Krishna Prasad 66-3-23, Tagore Type Institute Road Patamata, Vijayawada, N.T.R District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED By its Proprietor, aged 38 years, R/o. D.No. Near Ganganamma Temple High Court Petition under Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the praying that in compromise and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner/accused by Calendar and Judgment dt. 28.11.2022 passed in C.C. No. 512 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the IV Special Magistrate, Vijayawada Judgment. as was confirmed by the Counsel for the Petitioner/Appellant/Accused : SRI KISHORE KUMAR KATARI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2/Complainant: SRI PETLURI RAJU The Court made the following ORDER : NAGA ' APHC010101752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NQ: 278/2025 [3521] Between: SRI RAMA PLANNERS AND BUILDERS represented by its PROPRIETOR, P.V.RAJASEKHAR, S/0. P.V.KRISHNA PRASAD 38 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 66-3-23, TAGORE TYPE NEAR GANGANAMMA TEMPLE DISTRICT. AGED INSTITUTE ROAD, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. RESPONDENT 2.M/S SAI MAYUR GRANITES AND MARBLES, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, Y RAMA KRISHNA, S/0. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 54-15-9B, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BANK COLONY, NEAR TATA SHOW ROOM, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KISHORE KUMAR KATARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PETLURI NAGARAJU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 1 2 . ORDER: l■A.No■2 of 2025 I.A.No.2 of 2025 is filed seeking to compromise the petition. Affidavit is filed by both the parties along with joint memo. The Petitioner has paid settled amount by way of cash to the Respondent No.2. I.A.No.2 of 2025 is allowed permitting the Respondent No.2 to compromise the case subject to paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- each to the bar association within a period of one week from today. With the above observations and directions, I.A.No.2 is allowed, permitting the Respondent No.2 to compromise the petition and compound the offence. Crl.R.C.No.278 of 2025 The Petitioner/Accused and Respondent No.2/complainant are present. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised by compounding the offence. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned IV Special Magistrate, Vijayawada, in C.C.No.512 of 2020, dated 28.11.2022, as confirmed in CrlA.No.244 of 2022, dated 06.09.2024, by the learned VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, are set aside, as a result, the petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District I- 2. The IV Special Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District 3. One CC to Sri. Kishore Kumar Katari Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. Petiuri Naga Raju Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies Pradesh at Stu TAC Note: Conditional order passed in I.A No. 2 of 2025 has been complied with by the Appellant/Accused No.2/Complainant.and a cost memo is filed vide USR No.92477/2025 dated 21/08/2025 & Respondent (*along with the joint memo filed by the parties in I.A No.2 of 2025) HIGH COURT DATED:06/08/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 278 OF 2025 ll 15 SEP 2025 % . Current Section , DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS COMPROMISED