Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2025 DAILYLAW 925 (TRI)

SRI MANORANJAN DAS and Anr. v. THE STATE OF TRIPURA and Ors.

WP(C)/310/2025 · 2025-07-22

S Datta Purkayastha

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No.310 of 2025 1. Sri Manoranjan Das, son of Late Haricharan Das, aged about 45 years, resident of Char Ganki, P.O.+P.S.+Sub-Division – Khowai, District – Khowai, Tripura; 2. Sri Bimal Chandra Das, son of Late Umesh Chandra Das, aged about 76 years, resident of Ajagartilla, P.O.+P.S.+Sub-Division – Khowai, District – Khowai, Tripura; Both are Partners of M/s North Eastern Pharmaceutica, situated at Paradise Chowmuhani (opposite to Ayurvedic Hospital), P.O. Agartala-799001, P.S. West Agartala, District – West Tripura ......... Petitioner(s); Versus 1. State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, Government of Tripura, New Capital Complex, PO – Kunjaban, PS – New Capital Complex, Agartala, District – West Tripura, Pin –799010; 2. The District Magistrate & Collector, Sepahijala District, Bishramganj, Tripura; 3. The Chief Medical Officer-cum-Chairman, Executive Committee of District Health & Family Welfare Society, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Bisharamganj, Sepahijala District Tripura; 4. Food Safety Officer, Sonamura Sub-Division, office of the CMO, Sepahijala, Bisharamganj, Sepahijala District, Tripura; 5. Ayosh Drugs Agency, RMS Chowmuhani, PO – Agartala-799001, PS- West Agartala, District – West Tripura .........Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankar Lodh, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, Advocate. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA Order 22/07/2025 Heard both sides. Counsel for respondents stated that work order has already been placed on the successful tenderer and supplies have also been affected as per the work order, and nothing survives in the writ petition. He has also served on the counsel for petitioners the documents in support of the said submission. Having perused the said documents, counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the civil court for seeking damages after proving in the civil court that his client was disqualified illegally by the respondents. Permission is accorded as prayed for. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA, J) (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ) Pijush/ MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2025.07.23 10:56:26 +05'30'