Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92490 (PNJ)

SUBE SINGH v. SUNITA AND ORS

XOBJC/261/2015 · 2025-02-17

Alka Sarin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 238 FAO-595-2013 (O&M) with XOBJC-261-CII-2015 Date of decision : 17.02.2025 Sube Singh ... Appellant(s) Versus Sunita and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : None for the appellant. Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3/cross-objectors. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) FAO-595-2013 (O&M) 1. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3/cross-objectors states that the matter has since been settled between the parties. 2. The present appeal pertains to the year 2013. On 10.01.2024 none had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Even today, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non- prosecution. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. Ankur Goyal 2025.02.18 09:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-595-2013 (O&M) with --2-- XOBJC-261-CII-2015 XOBJC-261-CII-2015 4. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3-cross-objectors states that since the main case is dismissed for non-prosecution, cross- objections filed by them have been rendered infructuous. 5. Cross-objections are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 17.02.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Ankur Goyal 2025.02.18 09:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document