Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64474 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui ======================================================
1. Boudhu Manjhi S/O Late Fusan Manjhi R/O Village-Pohe, PS-Sikandra, Distt-Jamui
2. Sanjay Manjhi @ Bamha S/O Boudhu Manjhi R/O Village-Potie, PS- Sikandra, Distt-Jamui
3. Sudhir Manjhi S/O Boudhu Manjhi R/O Village-Potie, PS-Sikandra, Distt- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 11-11-2025 Heard both parties.
2. The petitioners seek bail in a case, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the FIR, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, while the informant’s son was going to the field, the petitioners, armed with iron rod, assaulted him, and later, during the course of treatment, the informant’s son died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from bare perusal of the FIR, it is apparent that informant is not eye-witness of the occurrence. Informant has not disclosed in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64474 of 2025(3) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 the FIR, the source of information as to how he came to know that the named accused persons committed the alleged offence. As a matter of fact, the son of informant met with an accident and died during course of treatment. Moreover, from perusal of postmortem report, it is apparent that cause of death is transcerebral and its complication resulting from hard and blunt force. Petitioners claim clean antecedent and petitioner no. 1 and 2 are in custody since 16.04.2025 and petitioner no. 3 is in custody since 27.05.2025.
5. Learned APP however, vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025.
vinita/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U