ON THE DEATH OF HARIHAR KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMT. LAXMI KALITA AND ANR. REPRESENTING v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 8 ORS.
WP(C)/7630/2017 · 2025-09-07
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9249 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9249 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010055652017
2025:GAU-AS:12183
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7630/2017 ON THE DEATH OF HARIHAR KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMT. LAXMI KALITA AND ANR. REPRESENTING W/O LT. HARIHAR KALITA, R/O MUGORIA, P.S. PATACHARKUCHI, DIST.
BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN - 781326.
1.1: SMT. LAXMI KALITA W/O. LATE HARIHAR KALITA 1.2: SRI ARUN KALITA S/O. LATE HARIHAR KALITA
BOTH ARE R/O. MUGORIA P.S. PATACHARKUCHI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781326 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 8 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -06.
2:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BARPETA ASSAM PIN - 781301.
3:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE PATACHARKUCHI POLICE STATION DIST. BARPETA ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 PIN - 781326.
4:SRI CHAKRA THAKURIA SUB REGISTER PATACHARKUCHI DIST. BARPETA ASSAMM PIN - 781326.
5:SRI MADAN KHATONIAR MOHORI AT SUB-REGISTER OFICE PATACHARKUCHI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN - 781326.
6:SRI MANORAMJAN KALITA
7:SRI BHUMIDHAR KALITA
8:SRI PRAMOD KALITA
9:SRI MADVA KALITA ALL RES. NO. 6-9 ARE SONS OF LATE- BHAGAWAN KALITA R/O MUGORIA P.S. PATACHARKUCHI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN - 781326 10:SRI NIPON TALUKDAR S/O SRI SAMPORNANANDA TALUKDAR R/O GANESHGURI P.S. DISPUR GUWAHATI -06 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S C DAS, MR P BURAGOHAIN,MR.R C DAS Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 08-09-2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. It is noticed that on 27.08.2018 also none represented the petitioner. It is further noticed that as per the Lawazima Court order dated 02.09.2025, despite direction to take steps, no steps has been taken. Considering the above, it appears that the petitioner in no longer interested to pursue this matter. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant