IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 138+144 CWP-23943 Kuldeep Kaur And Others vs. CWP-23990 Beant Kaur And Others vs. CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to grant the petitioners statutory pay scale as per the rules, view of the judgment in Punjab and anothe allowance/full pay alongwith all other emoluments period from the date of their appointment in the light of judgment in Kumar Singla and others vs. State of Punjab and others 17064-2017, decided present petition been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment manner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision 23943-2025 Kuldeep Kaur And Others vs. State of Punjab 23990-2025 Beant Kaur And Others vs. State of Punjab CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Jatinder Singh Mundi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant the petitioners statutory pay scale as per the rules, view of the judgment in Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and another, CWP-15896-2023, allowance/full pay alongwith all other emoluments period from the date of their appointment in the light of judgment in Kumar Singla and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2017, decided on 16.02.2023. Regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a representation dated 05.07.2025 been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 20.08.2025 f Punjab and Others f Punjab and Others BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant the petitioners statutory pay scale as per the rules, in Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of 2023, decided on 13.09.2024, and allowance/full pay alongwith all other emoluments during probation period from the date of their appointment in the light of judgment in Ajay Kumar Singla and others vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP- garding the claim raised in the 05.07.2025, Annexure P-14, has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgments, in a time bound PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.21 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-23943-2025 -2- 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, these petitions are hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 05.07.2025, taking note of the aforesaid judgments, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 4. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file(s). 20.08.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.21 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.