HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30936 of 2025 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Paritosh Shukla, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, prayer of his client is for restraining respondent nos. 3 and 4 from constructing road through his client's land bearing araji no. 397 as described in prayer A. 2. Mr. Roopesh Tiwari, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. Mr. Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 (the Nagar Nigam) and submits, there is no plan or order for constructing road through petitioner's araji. 3. The Nagar Nigam says, there is no plan or order to construct road through his araji. We have recorded the submission. It is sufficient for us to dispose of the writ petition. October 8, 2025 Mohini Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Paritosh Sukla, Prashant Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vijay Bahadur Maurya (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Jay Karan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad