2025:JHHC:23964 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.2091 of 2025 ----- Krishna Ram, son of late Rajkishor Ram, R/o Mohalla Behind Nawketan Cinema, Nawatoli, Ward No. 16, PO and PS Medininagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt.of Jharkhand, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi 2.The Director, AYUSH, Department of Health Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi 3.The Deputy Director, AYUSH, Department of Health Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4.The In-charge, District AYUSH Medical Officer, PO and PS Latehar, District Latehar … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr. SC-I …...... 05 /18.08.2025: Heard the parties. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that from 01.01.2018 onwards the increment of the salary has not been paid to the petitioner. The petitioner was a Compounder in the State Homeopathic Dispensary, Latehar. He superannuated from service in June, 2025. 3. It is his case that the increment from 2018 has not been paid to him though there was internal letter to consider the case of the petitioner after making proper entry in the service book. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioner files a detailed representation before the Director, Ayush, Department of Health Medical Education and Family Welfare- respondent no. 2, his case will be consider. 5. Considering the submission of the parties, I am of the opinion that the respondents should decide the claim of the petitioner. The petitioner should file a detailed representation before the respondent no.2-the Director, Ayush, Department of Health 2025:JHHC:23964 2 Medical Education and Family Welfare making all his claims along with necessary documents in support of the claim of the petitioner with copy of this order within four weeks. 6. The respondents should consider the case of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. If it is found that the petitioner is eligible for any amount the same should be disbursed to the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter. If the claim of the petitioner is rejected or a part of the claim is rejected, the reason for such rejection should be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/