CMP No.3090 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL C.M.P.No.3090 of 2025 in S.A.No.256 of 2011 --- R.Venkatesan (deceased) 1. V.Shanthi 2. V.Santhosh Kumar 3. V.Uma Maheswari .. Petitioners Vs. R.Veeraraghavan (deceased) V.Kalidas (deceased) 1. V.Malar 2. V.Ramesh 3. S.V.Kalyani 4. V.Nagabooshanam 5. V.Sathish Kumar 6. V.Jaikumar 7. Pramila .. Respondents C.M.P.No.3090 of 2025 in S.A.No.256 of 2011, filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of the CPC, praying to bring the legal heirs of Late R.Veeraraghavan (deceased), namely Nagabooshanam, W/o Late R.Veeraghavan, Sathish Kumar, S/o Late R.Veeraraghavan, Jaikumar, S/o Late R.Veeraraghavan and Pramila, D/o Late R.Veeraraghavan, being the proposed parties/proposed respondents as parties in the above S.A.No.256 of 2011. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No.3090 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 3 For petitioners : Mr.Venkataswamy Babu For respondents: R-1 died R-2 - notice served No appearance R-3 - vacated M/s.K.Shahul Hameed for RR-4 and R-7 R-5 not ready R-6 notice served. No appearance ORDER This petition is filed praying to bring the legal heirs of Late R.Veeraraghavan (deceased), namely Nagabooshanam, W/o Late R.Veeraghavan, Sathish Kumar, S/o Late R.Veeraraghavan, Jaikumar, S/o Late R.Veeraraghavan and Pramila, D/o Late R.Veeraraghavan, being the proposed parties/proposed respondents as parties in the above S.A.No.256 of 2011. 2. The respondents have not seriously objected to this petition. 3. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is allowed. 4. Registry is directed to carry out the amendment and list the Second Appeal for hearing on 24.08.2026. 13.08.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No.3090 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 3 P.DHANABAL, J cs CMP No. 3090 of 2025 in S.A.No.256 of 2011 13.08.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis