Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
07.03.2025 17 Court No.26
S.D.
CRM (DB) 426 of 2024
In re: An Application for cancellation of bail under Section 439 (2)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
-And-
In the matter of: Prabir Naskar
… … Petitioner
Mr. Satadru Lahiri
Mr. Safdar Azam
…For the Petitioner
Mr. Soumya Nag
Mr. Aditya Tiwari
… … For the O.P. No. 2
Mr. Rudradipta Nandy
Mr. Rana Mukherjee
Mr. Arabindo Manna
Ms. Mamata Jana
…For the State
Report called for by the order dated March 4, 2025 filed in Court by the State be taken on record. Report states that General Dairies lodged by the petitioner complaining of threat was enquired into. Only one resulted in a prosecution under Section 351 (2), BNS. Private opposite party was enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Judge on October 13, 2023. Order granting bail contains reasons. Trial is in progress.
2 Out of 19 charge sheeted witnesses, one was examined at the trial. Post bail misconduct is of a nature that in our view do not require cancellation of the bail granted excepting clarifying and modifying the conditions of bail as hereinafter. We clarify that one of the conditions granting bail to the private opposite party to mean that the private opposite party will not enter the area of the police station where the police case stands registered. Private opposite party will also not contact any of the prosecution witnesses either physically or in any manner including electronic form. C.R.M. (DB) 426 of 2024 stands disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)