HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31458 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The petitioner before this Court contends that during proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, an interim order was passed which is being violated by the private-respondent nos. 3 to 6, who are the co-sharer. 2. The petitioner has remedy of filing a contempt application. 3. Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. 4. This petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. September 10, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ram Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad