SANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9020/2025 · 2025-08-26
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92427 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92427 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
109
CRWP-9020-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9020-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2025
SANDEEP KAUR AND ANR. ….Petitioners
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Mandeep Singh Kaler, Advocate and Mr. Sarvjit Singh Rajpal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-W-1228-2025 Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the amended memo of parties is ordered to be taken on record Registry to do the needful.
Disposed of. Main Case
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 to 5 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Kapurthala Puneet Sharma 2025.08.27 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
109
CRWP-9020-2025 (O&M) -2- and they shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P-5).
2. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage.
3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2–The Senior Superintendent of Police, District Kapurthala is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate
order, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
5. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 26.08.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.08.27 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment