Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31215 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent no. 2 (Sub Divisional Magistrate, Handia, District: Prayagraj) to decide the Restoration Application No. RST/3840/2025, its computerized Case No. T202502030403840, pending in Case No. 1035/2023, its computerized case no. T202302030401035 (Kaushalya Devi Vs. Gram Sabha) under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as earliest as possible in stipulated period."
2. It is contended that a restoration application being Restoration Application No. RST/3840/2025, Computerized Case No. T- 202502030403840, in Case No. 1035 of 2023 is pending consideration before the respondent No. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is to expedite the aforesaid case.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide the Restoration Application No. RST/3840/2025, Computerized Case No. T- 202502030403840, pending in Case No. 1035 of 2023, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 9, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Mishra, Raj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Kaushalya Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad