HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31102 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the order passed in proceedings under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2. In view of the said fact, no writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India lies. 3. Writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is open to the petitioners to file an appeal before the appellate authority within 15 days. 4. In case, the said appeal is filed within the period mentioned above, appellate authority shall not go into the question of limitation and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. September 9, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ram Lakhan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad