HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4563 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionists has stated at the Bar that the application 11Kha under Section 227 Cr.P.C. moved by the applicant/revisionist was dismissed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court no. 7, Azamgarh, vide order dated 25.07.2024, against which the present revision has been filed. However, subsequent to the order dated 25.07.2024, charge has been framed against the revisionists and therefore, the impugned order has lost its relevance and the present revisionist has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the revisionists, the instant revision is dismissed as infructuous. However, it shall remain open to the revisionists to seek appropriate remedy as available under the law. September 10, 2025 Faridul Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dinesh Yadav, G.A. (Harvir Singh,J.) Parveen Yadav @ Ujala And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad