Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92404 (ALL)

PHOOL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13279/2025 · 2025-09-07

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13279 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Rupesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding to the respondent District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri to grant appropriate selection grade (ACP) to the petitioners w.e.f. 2012 alongwith 18% interest o delayed payment and to allow the writ petitioner with cost in the interest of justice. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents Basic Shiksha Adhikari to consider and pass appropriate final reasoned speaking orders on the representations of petitioners dated 09.06.2025/12.06.2025 ensuring benefits of selection grade (ACP) permissible under the law with arrears and interest within reasonable time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. iii. Issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. iv. Award the cost of the petition." Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for ventilation of their grievances, the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representation. However, despite representation moved by the petitioners, no heed has yet been paid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rupesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manvendra Singh Phool Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that in case petitioner move fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh application/representation, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 8, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 13279 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad