- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3817 RSA No. 200049 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 200049 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. NAFEEZ BEGUM W/O YOUSUF QURESHI, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: H.NO.1-4-120 ANSARI GALLI, GOULIWADA ADJACENT TO MPHS SCHOOL, SIDDI TALEEM BIDAR, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR – 585 401. 2. KANEER BEGUM W/O SHAIK KHURSHEED, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: H.NO.1-4-120 ANSARI GALLI, GOULIWADA ADJACENT TO MPHS SCHOOL, SIDDI TALEEM BIDAR, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR – 585 401. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI JAIRAJ K BUKKA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. YASMIN W/O MA RASHEED (D/O SHAIK HUSSAIN), AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3817 RSA No. 200049 of 2025 R/O: H. NO.1-4-120 ANSARI GALLI, GOULIWADA ADJACENT TO MPHS SCHOOL, SIDDI TALEEM, BIDAR. NOW R/AT: H.NO.2-4-663 KACHIGUDA SUNDAR NAGAR AMBERPET ROAD, HYDERABAD – 560 001 TELANGANA STATE. 2. SHAIK SYED S/O LATE AHMED, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE, R R/O: H.NO.1-4-120 ANSARI GALLI, GOULIWADA ADJACENT TO MPHS SCHOOL, SIDDI TALEEM BIDAR, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR – 585 401. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED HON’BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BIDAR IN R.A.NO.61/2023 OLD R.A.NO.57/2020 DATED 10.06.2024 IS LIABLE TO SET ASIDE AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM BIDAR IN O.S.NO.113/2017 DATED 26.02.2020 AND THEREBY GRANT THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN THE NAME APPELLANTS, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3817 RSA No. 200049 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT When matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for third time, this Court on 19.06.2025, granted two weeks’ time as finally for compliance of office objections and in case of non-compliance, ordered matter to be listed for further orders. Till date, office objections are not complied. There is no representation. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE MSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22