AMARJEET SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION,
WPSS/50/2023 · 2025-09-11
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 924 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 924 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8103 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/50/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had challenged the transfer order, made in 2022; however, no interim order was passed and petitioner has joined the transferred place. Thus writ petition has become infructuous.
3. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.09.2025 Mahinder/
MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a 92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D 305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.09.11 17:52:58 +05'30'