Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 924 (MEG)

VIRENDER SINGH v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR.

Crl.M.C./52/2025 · 2025-07-04

B Bhattacharjee

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 17 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No.52 of 2025 in Crl.Rev.P. No.9 of 2024 Date of Order: 04.07.2025 Shri. Virender Singh Aged about 45 years S/o Raj Karan Yadav R/o of Dabarpur Village P.O. Ajerka P.S. Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan …..Petitioner -VERSUS- 1. The State of Meghalaya, represented by Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya 2. Smti. Peboni Sangma Daughter of Shri. Jangkarnath Joisi R/o H.No. 63, Rongreng Chidekore, Village Williamnagar, Dist- East Garo Hills, Meghalaya-79411 …..Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. M. Lyngdoh, Adv For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl.PP (R:1) Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl.PP Mr. C.K. Marak, Adv (R:2) 2025:MLHC:583 (ORAL) Heard Mr. M. Lyngdoh, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl.PP appearing for the respondent No.1 and also Mr. C.K. Marak, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2. By this application, the applicant has sought for impleadment of the respondent No.2 as a party respondent No.2 in Crl.Rev.P. No.9 of 2024. The learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the prayer of impleadment of the respondent No.2 in Crl.Rev.P. No.9 of 2024. Hence, the prayer made in this application is allowed. The respondent No.2 is impleaded as a party respondent No.2 in Crl.Rev.P. No.9 of 2024. The applicant shall take necessary steps for adding the name of the respondent No.2 in the cause title of the criminal revision petition. The application stands allowed. Judge Meghalaya 04.07.2025 “Shrity,PS” 2025:MLHC:583 Digitally signed by SHRITY CH MOMIN Date: 2025.07.04 14:29:15 IST