138/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DARSHAN LAL SHRI ANAND MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Addl. A.G. Haryana HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Hon’ble Apex Court in Diary No(s).31796 In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 25.07.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: LAL Versus SHRI ANAND MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate for the Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Addl. A.G. Haryana **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Hon’ble Apex Court in vide order dated 18.07.2025 passed in SLP(Civil) Diary No(s).31796-2025. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3625-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 25, 2025 ........Petitioner SHRI ANAND MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND OTHERS ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been stayed by the vide order dated 18.07.2025 passed in SLP(Civil) In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the SLP. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) July 25, 2025 s Learned State counsel representing the respondents stayed by the vide order dated 18.07.2025 passed in SLP(Civil) In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.07.29 04:15 I agree to specified portions of this document