Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9238 (RAJ)

AKASH KUMAR NAMA v. STATE LOCAL SELF AND ANR

CW/11411/2012 · 2025-03-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11411/2012 Akash Kumar Nama S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Nama, House No. 27/310, Ward No. 23, Retwali, Kota Raj. ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan through Secretary, State Level Municipal (Subordinate & Ministerial Services) Commission, Department of Local Self Government, Swayat Shasan Bhawan, G-3, Raj Mahal Residency Area, Jaipur-302001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sameer Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that respondents vide advertisement dated 08.09.2011 invited applications for the post of Assistant Fire Officers. It is further submitted that similar situated candidates/persons as that of petitioner received call letter from the respondents for interview conducted on 23.06.2012 and 24.06.2012 at Jaipur, however, petitioner is treated in a discriminatory manner, resultant to which petitioner was unable to appear in the aforesaid interview. Further, it is submitted that despite filing representation before the competent authority, no call letter or notice was given to the petitioner. Therefore, being aggrieved of the same, the petitioner has filed the instant petition. [2025:RJ-JP:10756] (2 of 2) [CW-11411/2012] Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded that no interim protection is operational qua the petitioner and petitioner is aged approximately 40 Years as on date. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, it is noted that there are disputed question of facts, and nothing is placed on record qua the vacant seats, as on date, for the said post. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the present petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /64