CR No.5612 of 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 140 ANITA SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Mr. Ms. Maninee, Advocate for the petitioners. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. The short prayer in the present revision direction to the Petition CIS No.LAC/94 Haryana and others’ [2]. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. [3]. On asking of the Court, notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. parties and also i this stage, there is no n this stage, as no order prejudicial to the interest of the [4]. In the present case, land of the petitioners situated within the revenue estate of village Harsaru, District Gurugram was sought to be acquired vide Notification dated 27.12.2013 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, CR No.5612 of 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5612 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: ANITA SHARMA AND OTHERS ...... STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Maninee, Advocate for the petitioners. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) The short prayer in the present revision direction to the learned Reference Court-cum- Petition CIS No.LAC/94/2019 titled ‘Sachin Kumar Singla etc. vs. State of Haryana and others’ in an expeditious and time bound manner. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. On asking of the Court, Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity of calling upon response from the respondent(s) at this stage, as no order prejudicial to the interest of the In the present case, land of the petitioners situated within the revenue estate of village Harsaru, District Gurugram was sought to be acquired vide Notification dated 27.12.2013 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5612 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:21.08.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA with The short prayer in the present revision petition is for issuance of -Authority to decide the Reference ‘Sachin Kumar Singla etc. vs. State of time bound manner. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. . Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana accepts Having heard learned counsel for the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at ecessity of calling upon response from the respondent(s) at this stage, as no order prejudicial to the interest of the respondents is being passed. In the present case, land of the petitioners situated within the revenue estate of village Harsaru, District Gurugram was sought to be acquired vide Notification dated 27.12.2013 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1 is for issuance of to decide the Reference ‘Sachin Kumar Singla etc. vs. State of . Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana accepts Having heard learned counsel for the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at ecessity of calling upon response from the respondent(s) at is being passed. In the present case, land of the petitioners situated within the revenue estate of village Harsaru, District Gurugram was sought to be acquired vide Notification dated 27.12.2013 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, MOHMED ATIK 2025.08.26 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR No.5612 of 2025 (O&M) 1894 followed by Estates, Gurugram on [5]. Aggrieved thereof, the petitioners/landowners preferred Reference under Section 64 & 76 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabili seeking enhancement of market value and the compensation which consideration before the “Authority” past around 06 years. [6]. In view of above pending for consideration before the around 06 years 27.12.2013 and the delay may burden the responde case of enhancement requested to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same preferably within a period of 08 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of [7]. Petition August 21, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CR No.5612 of 2025 (O&M) 1894 followed by an Award passed by the Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estates, Gurugram on 23.12.2016. Aggrieved thereof, the petitioners/landowners preferred Reference under Section 64 & 76 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 seeking enhancement of market value and the compensation which ideration before the “Authority” under the Act around 06 years. In view of above; considering the fact that the Reference Petition is pending for consideration before the “Authority around 06 years whereas the acquisition commenced vide Notification dated and the delay may burden the responde case of enhancement, the Reference Court-cum requested to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same preferably within a period of 08 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of Petition along with the pending application 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No passed by the Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Aggrieved thereof, the petitioners/landowners preferred Reference under Section 64 & 76 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in tation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with prayer for seeking enhancement of market value and the compensation which is pending under the Act since the year 2019 i.e. for considering the fact that the Reference Petition is Authority” under the 2013 Act for the past the acquisition commenced vide Notification dated and the delay may burden the respondent-State of statutory interest in cum-Authority under the 2013 Act requested to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same preferably within a period of 08 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. pending applications, if any stand disposed of. pending applications, if any stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 passed by the Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Aggrieved thereof, the petitioners/landowners preferred Reference under Section 64 & 76 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in with prayer for is pending 2019 i.e. for the considering the fact that the Reference Petition is under the 2013 Act for the past the acquisition commenced vide Notification dated st in Authority under the 2013 Act is requested to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same preferably within a stand disposed of. MOHMED ATIK 2025.08.26 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment