Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92365 (ALL)

MANJU DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/32483/2025 · 2025-09-16

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32483 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer; "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to decide the stay application filed in appeal No. 8987/2025 (Manju Devi Vs. Tehsildar (Judicial) and others), under section 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within such reasonable time pending before the respondent no.2." 2. It is contended that in the appeal filed under Section 35 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 a stay application has been preferred, which is pending consideration before the respondent No. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid stay application. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide the stay application filed in Appeal No. 8987 of 2025 (Manju Devi Vs. Tehsildar (Judicial) and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 17, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Narain Mishra, Mani Shankar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sheikh Obaidullah (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Manju Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad