2025:CGHC:10995 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 234 of 2025 Mrs. Beena Sharma W/o Shishir Prakash Sharma Aged About 35 Years R/o Sector-1 Street 8 Block 18 Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Sta- tion Bhilai Bhatti, District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Dr. Shishir Prakash Sharma S/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 45 Years Posted As-Assistant Professor, Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala, R/o Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala, Raj- nandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 - Prakash Nath Sharma S/o B. N. Sharma Aged About 71 Years Re- tired Employee From Bsp R/o Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Kishori Sharma W/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 69 Years R/o Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala Rajnandgaon, Dis- trict Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5 - Piyush Prakash Sharma S/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 44 Years Posted As Professor In Physical Education At Kriti Engineering College, Raipur (C.G.), R/o No. 4, Manzapara Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Pratistha Sharma W/o Piyush Prakash Sharma Aged About 36 Years Posted As Project Officer Under Chhattisgarh Government R/o No. 4, Manzapara Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Prasun Jha S/o K. K. Jha Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Surgi, P. S. Surgi, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Gunjan Jha W/o Prasun Jha Aged About 41 Years Posted As Scientist In Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur R/o Village Surgi, P.S. Surgi, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : None For Respondents : None ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 06.03.2025 1. None appears, nor is any representation on behalf of the applicant in spite of the matter being called. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge alfiza