Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92342 (ALL)

MAINA DEVI v. LAL JEE AND 6 OTHERS

A227/10533/2025 · 2025-09-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10533 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " Issue an order or direction to the Court of Upper Civil Judge (J.D) VIth Jaunpur to decide the 6C Application in suit No.520 of 2003 (Lal Jee Vs. Rukmeena Devi and others) within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2003 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Upper Civil Judge (J.D) VIth Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Verma, Radhey Shyam Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Maina Devi .....Petitioner(s) Lal Jee And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 8, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 10533 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad