Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92332 (ALL)

PANKAJ PRATAP SINGH URF PANKAJ CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/31021/2025 · 2025-10-05

Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31021 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Divisional Level Security Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner and further the petitioner is seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.1 to decide the representation dated 11.07.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing prayer no.1 and at this stage, he is only praying that the petitioner's representation dated 11.07.2025 may be decided at the earliest. 4. Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.1-Principal Secretary (Home), Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 11.07.2025 within six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case of the petitioner on merits. It is upon respondent No. 1 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 6, 2025 Nitendra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Pankaj Pratap Singh Urf Pankaj Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad