[2025:RJ-JP:9729-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 221/2024 Vibhuti Shankar Bajpai Son Of Late Shri Shambhu Ratan Bajpai, Aged About 78 Years, Resident Of Durgadatt Panch Ki Haveli, Nasa Gate, Nawalgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu Through Power Of Attorney Anurag Bajpai, Son Of Shri Vibhuti Shankar Bajpai, Aged 43 Years, Resident Of 3/20, Pashupati Nagar, Naubasta, Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Naveen Jain, Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Sitaram Jat, The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Sunil Kumar Saini, Secretary, Managing Committee, Shri Nawalgarh Primary School, Nansa Gate, Nawalgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 641/2024 Smt. Malti Jain W/o Late Shri Om Prakash Jain, Aged About 79 Years, Resident Of1001/b-7, Rps Savana, Rps City, Near K.r. Manglam World School, Sector-88, Kheri Kalan (113), Faridabad, Haryana-121002. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashish Modi, Ias, Director, Secondary Education, Samta Nagar, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Nihal Chand Pahadia, Secretary, K.d. Jain Shikshan Parisad, Madanganj-Kishangarh, District- Ajmer (Raj.) And Secretary, K.d. Jain Sr. Secondary School, Madanganj Kishangarh, District-Ajmer (Raj.). 3. State Or Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:9729-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-221/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh, Mr. Tarun Kumar Verma on behalf of Mr. Anuroop Singhi For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG assisted by Mr. Avinash Choudhary Mr. Hardik Singh HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 05/03/2025 Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the respondents that the amount whichever was found payable according to them has been paid to the petitioners, we are not inclined to proceed further in the contempt petitions. The contempt petitions are therefore dismissed. Rule is discharged. However, the petitioners will be at liberty to challenge the computation on such grounds as may be available to them under the law by separately instituted petitions. A copy of this order be placed in the connected file. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ INDER/PAYAL/55 & 56