IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 RSA-4901-2014 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.08.2025 Vinod Kumar ...... Appellant versus Sukhchain Lal ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Taanvi Dhull, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Hitesh Ghai, Advocate for the respondent. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that in a separate suit, challenged in RSA No.3091 of 2024 decided vide judgment dated 10.03.2025, the respondents have already taken possession and thus, nothing survives in the present suit for injunction. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 26.08.2025 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.08.29 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document