Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92319 (PNJ)

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMANT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/23964/2025 · 2025-08-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CWP No. 23964 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23964 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.08.2025 CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD. ….Petitioner V/S STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI, JUDGE Present:- Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by petitioner/bank aggrieved by non-execution of the order dated 19.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by the District Magistrate, Jind under the provisions of Section 14 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act for brevity). 2. It is rather surprising that concerned Tehsildar-cum-Executive Magistrate, Uchana, District Jind, i.e. respondent no. 3 has failed to discharge his statutory duty of assisting and handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner Bank. 3. Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) are a huge burden on the public exchequer, banking and financial system, and, thus, prompt enforcement of recovery mechanism under the SARFAESI Act is paramount for liquidity in the system. 4. In view of the above, this court by way of writ of mandamus directs respondent no.3 or the concerned authority to execute the order dated 19.06.2025 KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.26 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP No. 23964 of 2025 (Annexure P-2) passed under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act by handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner Bank as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of 30 days. The petitioner/bank, thereafter, can proceed to adopt all possible legitimate means to liquidate the secured asset to recover the due amount. 5. The petition for the time being stands disposed of in the terms aforesaid. Needless to say that the guidelines laid down by Coordinate Bench in Bank of Maharashtra Vs. District Magistrate, Hisar And Others [CWP-7018- 2022 decided on 28.05.2024] and directions issued by this Court in CWP No. 23941 of 2025 titled AU Small Finance Bank v. State of Punjab and Others decided on 20.08.2025, be adhered to by the concerned authorities. 6. We hasten to add that this order shall however be subject to any restraint/ interim/ final order which may have been passed by any judicial forum, in favour of the borrowers/ guarantor/ any aggrieved person, who is party to this lis. 7. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE 20.08.2025 Kamal Gandhi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.26 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document