Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:6409-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29540 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardan Prasad Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated December 12, 2023 filed by him. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the representation dated December 12, 2023 before the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Prayagraj, however the same has not yet been decided by the said authority. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Prayagraj should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated December 12, 2023. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Prayagraj is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated December 12, 2023 within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Kpy (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad