Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9230 (UTT)

BHAJAN KAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/772/2024 · 2025-03-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.772 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Kundan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel submitted that after investigation a charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. 4. This writ petition was filed by the informant for proper investigation in the matter. Now charge sheet has been filed under Sections 308, 504 and 506 of IPC against respondent no.6 only, while respondent no.5 has been exonerated, after investigation. 5. In this view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.03.2025 SK