HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30948 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.449 of 2025, under Section 87/137(2) BNS, Police Station- Soro, District- Kasganj, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 8, 2025 #Vik/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitish Kumar Pandey, Onkar Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Moharvati And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad