HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10517 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i. Direct the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide the 6C application dated 21.03.2025 filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of C.P.C. in Original Suit No.548 of 2025 (Rahul Kumar Pandey Vs. Anurag Singh Mehta), expeditiously, within a time bound period as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court preferably within a period of one month." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 21.03.2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kavindra Singh, Nipun Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Singh Mehta .....Petitioner(s) Rahul Kumar Pandey .....Respondent(s) of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 8, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 10517 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad