Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9225 (UTT)

ROSHAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1259/2025 · 2025-10-15

Alok Mahra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9212 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.1259 of 2025 15th October, 2025 Roshan Singh --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned AGA for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Applicant Roshan Singh, who is in judicial custody in Case Crime/FIR No.84 of 2025, under Section 376 of IPC, registered at P. S. Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 3. As per the prosecution story, the applicant and the complainant were in a love relationship since the year 2021. During this period, they developed physical relations on several occasions. In February 2025, the complainant became pregnant, whereafter the applicant allegedly gave her a pill claiming it to be for abortion. 2025:UHC:9212 2 Subsequently, when the complainant asked the applicant to marry her, he refused, stating that he was already married. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the complainant reiterated the facts stated in the FIR and admitted that the relationship between her and the applicant was consensual. He has further submitted that there is a considerable delay in lodging the FIR; that, applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. 5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the relationship between the parties, the contents of the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS, and the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents, this Court is of the view that, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 2025:UHC:9212 3 7. The bail application is thus, allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. (Alok Mahra, J.) 15.10.2025 BS BALWAN T SINGH Digitally signed by BALWANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=fbbd191c8bdb8b16e8ca7937deaf72a17c02f e2eacbf28cdf4ba7ce8640c5820, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=04E141DF4614F9A4D5F48346EB553D E5185F418755DC00A7A13C14A680C3FA90, cn=BALWANT SINGH Date: 2025.10.15 17:35:10 +05'30'