Ravuri Venkateswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6209/2020 · 2025-09-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9223 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9223 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010101042020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6209/2020 Between:
1. RAVURI VENKATESWARA RAO, , S/O. LATE ABRAHAM AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE NELAPADU VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TULLUR, TULLUR MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P.
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, TULLUR, TULLUR MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6209 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or orders, Direction to declaring the action of the 4th respondent in trying to dispossessing the petitioner from house site in Sy. No. 139, for an admeasuring of 0-06 Cents situated in Nelapadu village, Tullur Mandal, Guntur District is highly illegal, arbitrary, violation of Art 14,19 (g) and 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of principle of Natural Justice. and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere the petitioners the petitioners house site in Sy. No. 139, for an admeasuring of 0-06 Cents situated in Nelapadu Village, Tullur Mandal, Guntur District and pass.…”
2. Heard Sri G. Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering with the subject property as well the civil disputes between petitioner and third parties.
5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and their parties. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.6209 of 2020
Dated.08.09.2025
TVN
192