Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92229 (ALL)

RADHA GAUR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

WRIA/13333/2025 · 2025-09-08

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13333 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay all the consequential service benefits alongwith interest, on account of death of her husband namely late Ashok Kumar Gaur son of late Ram Padarath, which is applicable under the law. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay family pension alongwith arrears with interest (on account of death of her husband namely late Ashok Kumar Gaur son of late Ram Padarath), which is applicable under the law." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the respondent no.1-Union of India, Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2, perused the contents made in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Diptiman Singh Radha Gaur .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, Registrar, Allahabad University, Allahabad is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 9, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 13333 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad