TEENA SINGH @ TINA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/44983/2025 · 2025-09-05
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92223 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92223 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-44983-2025 (O & M) ::1::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (241) CRM-M-44983-2025 (O & M)
Date of decision: 05.09.2025 Teena Singh @ Tina Singh and anr. …... Petitioners V/s State of Haryana and anr. ...Respondents CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Deepender Singh, Advocate, and Ms. Nidhi Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
On 19.08.2025, the following order was passed:- The prayer in this petition under Section 482 of the BNSS is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.731 dated 17.07.2018 under Sections 386, 389, 506, 34 IPC registered at P.S. Fariabad, Central, District Faridabad (Haryana) consequent upon cancellation of Regular Bail by the Trial court on account of first non appearance vide order dated 10.11.2021 (Annexure P-7 leading to issuance of non bailable warrants issued against the petitioners. The Counsel for the petitioners contends that they are ready and willing to join the proceedings once again. Notice of motion 05.09.2025.
SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.09.05 23:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
CRM-M-44983-2025 (O & M) ::2:: In the meanwhile, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of one week from today and subject to a deposit of Rs.50,000/- as costs with the Sadhna Society for the Mentally Handicapped, Near Housing Board Chowk, Raen Basera Building, Manimajra, Sector 13, Chandigarh, they shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The petitioners are directed to produce the copy of the order granting them bail on the next date of hearing.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in deference to the aforementioned order, the petitioners have joined proceedings and are regularly appearing before the Trial Court.
3. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed.
4. This petition stands disposed of accordingly.
5. It is expected that the petitioners shall not absent themselves from the Trial in future without sufficient cause. September 05, 2025
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.09.05 23:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh