Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31101 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State, Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent-University and perused the record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner is to direct the respondent no.3 to decide the Second Appeal No.S06/A/0843/2025 expeditiously.
4. The matter is pending before the respondent no.3 and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Shukla, Himanshu Singh, Shreyansh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avneesh Tripathi, C.S.C., Kunal Ravi Singh Dr Deepak Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
the aforesaid second appeal strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order but without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. September 9, 2025 S.K.
WRIC No. 31101 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad