Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92207 (PAT)

Sonu Kumar @ Aditya Raj v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./74219/2025 · 2025-12-19

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74219 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2025 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Aditya Raj son of Shyam Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Bakhri Dua PS -Garaul Distt -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pintu Kumar Patel For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 19-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khajekalla P. S. Case No. 211 of 2025 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 308(5), 3(5) of B.N.S and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 19.05.2025 at about 07:40 P.M., he received information that three accused persons had fired gunshots at this brother. Upon reaching the spot, he found his brother lying on the ground with blood oozing from his body. He was subsequently declared dead. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74219 of 2025(3) dt.19-12-2025 2/2 transpired in this case during the course of investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Manish Kumar @ Vicky Kumar. The petitioner is alleged to be only a conspirator, and there is no allegation that he participated in the actual commission of the alleged offence. The petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2025. Charge sheet has already been submitted. Similarly situated co-accused has already been allowed bail by this Court vide order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 85215 of 2025. 5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and the period of custody, this bail application is allowed. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C 1st , Patna City in connection with Khajekalla P. S. Case No. 211 of 2025. vashudha/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T