s $ APHC010101142014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 88 OF 2014 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against order dated 11.10.2013 in W.P.No.27470 of 2013 on the file of this Court. Between: Dudala Nageswara Rao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged about 50 years R/o.Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development & Fisheries (Fish.II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Hyderabad 3. The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru 4. The Deputy Director of Fisheries Fisheries Department, Eluru, West Godavari District 5. The Fisheries Development Officer, Eluru, West Godavari District 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Eluru Division at Eluru West Godavari District 7. The Tahsildar, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District 8. Boyina Saibabu, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged 53 years, R/o. Pothunuru Village, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WAMP 116 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated 11.10.2013, passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in W.P.M.P. No. 34049 of 2013 in W.P. No. 27470 of 2013 by restoring the Status Quo orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI S GANESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3, 6 & 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following order: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench Sr.No;- AT AMARAVATI APHC010101142014 3 [3483] I WRIT APPEAL NO: 88 of 2014 ...Appellant Dudala Nageswara Rao, West Godavari District. Vs. ...Respondents The State of A.P. and others *****:k**** None Advocate for appellant Advocate for respondents Sri S. Ganesh (R-8) CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 11th July 2025 P C : Sri S. Ganesh, learned counsel for respondent No.8, states that the rendered infructuous inasmuch as the appeal was preferred against an interim order and in the interregnum, the main petition has since been disposed of. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR matter has been 2. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Turaga Sai Surya Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri S Ganesh Advocate [OPUC] 3. TwoCCsto GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP for Fisheries High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:11/07/2025 ORDER WA NO. 88 OF 2014 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS