Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9219 (KAR)

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS v. PRAHALLAD

RP/200020/2024 · 2025-02-14

Suraj Govindaraj

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1101 RP No. 200020 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 200020 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-02 THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER (UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT (UKP) ALMATTI TALUK NIDAGUNDI DISTRICT VIJAYAPURA-586101. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT VIJAYAPURA-586101. 4. THE SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BENGALURU-02 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD DIVISION VIJAYAPURA-586101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MALLAHAR RAO., AAG FOR SRI. SHIVAKUMAR TENGAT, AGA ) AND: PRAHALLAD S/O PANDURANGACHARYA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.21 16:30:59 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1101 RP No. 200020 of 2024 R/O NIDAGUNDI TALUK AND DISTRICT VIJAYAPURA-586213. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RATNA N. SHIVAYOGIMATH., ADVOCATE) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W 47, RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 01.06.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.201384/2022 (LA-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND BY RESPONDENT RECALLING THE SAME AND CONSEQUENTLY, THE WRIT PETITION BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL FILE FOR HEARING ON MERITS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The State is before this Court seeking for review of the order dated 1.6.2023; Review the order dated 01.06.2023 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition No.201384/2022 (LA- RES) vide Annexure-A and by recalling the same and consequently, the Writ Petition be restored to its original file for hearing on merits in the interest of justice and equity. 2. Sri.Mallahar Rao., learned Additional Advocate General submits that notification for acquisition has been issued in respect of the balance 10 guntas of land. If that be so, there is no review which is - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1101 RP No. 200020 of 2024 required to be made of the aforesaid order. The petition stands dismissed. 3. In the event of the respondent being aggrieved by any notification or the notification for acquisition not being issued, liberty is reserved to the respondent to agitate the same before the appropriate forum. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1