MST. KHURSHI v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE AND ORS
OWP/1780/2017 · 2025-05-15
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9219 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9219 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 10
Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP 1780/2017
MST. KHURSHI …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: None
Vs.
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nighat Amin, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 15.05.2025
The record reveals that for the last two consecutive dates of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and same is the position as on today. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the case any further. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 15.05.2025 Sakeena