Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10470 of 2025
Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"i. to direct the court of learned Additional Session Judge /Additional District Judge-I, Ghazipur to decide Arbitration Case no.272 of 2021 (Mamta Yadav Versus District Magistrate/Arbitrator and others) pending since 24.09.2021 before Additional Session Judge/ Additional District Judge-I, Ghazipur within stipulated period as pleased to have been fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Arbitration Case no.272 of 2021 is pending since 2021 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Session Judge /Additional District Judge-I, Ghazipur to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
September 4, 2025 S. Singh
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mamta Yadav .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad