Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:11466 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2367 of 2025
----- Dilip Tudu, S/o Rayla Tudu, R/o Bara Barmasiya Motipahari, P.O. & P.S.- Borio, District- Sahibganj, State- Jharkhand
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party(s).
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, A.P.P.
…...... 04/ 16.04.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2.
This is an application filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of Sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 apprehending their arrest for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, 353, 307, 332, 333, 427, 379, 224, 225, 120(B) of IPC further added Section 411 of IPC.
3.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
4.
There is an allegation that this petitioner and others tried to rescue Surya Narayan Hansda from the custody of the police. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R along with 12 others named accused and huge number of unknown persons.
5.
Considering the nature of the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in connection with Borio P.S. Case No.61 of 2021, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, stands rejected.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./