Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9217 (RAJ)

MUNICIPAL BOARD KOTPUTALI v. SECRETARY TO THE GOV ANDORS

CW/15853/2009 · 2025-07-09

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15853/2009 Municipal Board Kotputali through Executive Officer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary to the Government Local Self Government, Department, Rajasthan Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, Local Body, Rajasthan Jaipur 3. Shri Salasar Balaji Build Home Pvt. Ltd. R/o 64-65 Venkateshwar Colony, Sodala, Jaipur ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4285/2009 Shri Salasar Balaji Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. A company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its Registered Office at A-16, Shyam Nagar, Nadi Ka Phatak Bainad Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur represented by its authorized signatory/Director Shri Ravindra Prashad Gupta Son of Shri Ram Swaroopji resident of 64-65 Venkateshwar Colony, Sodala, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Local Self Body, Jaipur. 2. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Mandal, Kotputli, Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pratyush Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/07/2025 (2 of 2) [CW-15853/2009] Counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of these petitions, the amount in question has been deposited by the respondent and thereafter, the sale deed has been executed, hence under the changed circumstances, no further cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with these petitions and these petitions have become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for revival of these petitions, in case any cause of action/grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/62-63