Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92167 (ALL)

M/S NIMI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/31083/2025 · 2025-09-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31083 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Shri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the Noida Authority. 2. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking following relief- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 2/3 to decide the objection of the petitioner dated 21.7.2025 (Annexed as Annexure No. 12 to this writ petition) as so submitted in reply to the show cause notice dated 15.07.2025. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 2/3 not to interfere/demolish the structure over Khasra No. 751 of an area 440 Sq. Y. / 367.88 Sq.M. situated in Village-Salarpur Khadar, Pargana and Tehsil-Dadri, Noida, District-Gautam Buddh Nagar. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the impugned notice dated 15.7.2025 issued by respondent No. 3 against the petitioner (Annexed as Annexure No. 11 to this writ petition)." 3. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that interest of justice would be sub-served by issuing a direction to the second respondent to consider the cause of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petitioner has filed a detailed objection, which is appended as Annexure- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh M/S Nimi Developers Pvt. Ltd., .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 14 to the writ petition, the same shall be decided expeditiously. 4. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concern shall pass order independently, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. It is directed that till disposal of the objection by the authority, the parties shall maintain status quo as on today. 6. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Kirti WRIC No. 31083 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad